2.001: ibm's amazing splash dance, part deux
A couple of month's ago, I posted a review of how the various storage vendors were embracing flash drives (or weren't, as the case may be). I then followed that up with a post lamenting the lame (and factually incorrect) white paper describing IBM's approach to enterprise flash drives.
I complained then that IBM was throwing cold water on a very key new technology; the fact that the errors in that white paper STILL haven't been corrected after nearly TWO MONTHS underscores my observation that IBM is totally out of touch with reality, and no longer the "trusted advisor" they once were.
(What happened, BarryW – I know you were working on getting those errors corrected!)
But today's news takes the cake: instead of doing it themselves (today IS IBM-Announcement-Tuesday, after all), IBM let STEC be the one to announce IBM's support for flash SSDs.
In my book, when you trivialize the importance of ANY technology to the point of having your supplier announce GA and availability rather than doing it yourself, it means something. And when IBM's sales force is to this day telling prospects that flash SSDs are "unproven technology" and "not ready for the enterprise," I can only conclude that IBM is embarrassed to admit some huge limitation or inadequacy of their products when used with Flash.
So, I asked myself…
…what is ibm trying to hide?
Now, I know better than to ask either BarryW or TonyP for an honest answer to a question like that.
So instead I turned to the paragon of accuracy for all things IBM – RedBooks and RedPapers.
Lo and behold, there is actually a RedPaper titled "DS8000: Introducing Solid State Drives!" Looks like exactly the resource I'd need to understand how IBM is supporting flash in their array…and possibly some insights as to why they aren't making any noise about it.
And indeed it is, even though the current version is plainly labeled "Draft Document for Review April 28, 2009 3:02pm." While there are likely to be some minor grammatical edits, I'm reasonably confident that the actual implementation and configuration details won't change.
Here's what I learned about their DS8K support for STEC SSDs from this RedPaper:
- SSDs are available only on new DS8K systems – they cannot be added to existing systems (EFDs can be added, non-disruptively, to any CLARiiON CX4-series, Symmetrix DMX4 or V-Max storage array, new or as an upgrade)
- The DS8K does not support RAID-6 or RAID-10 on their SSDs - only RAID- 5 is allowed at this time (All of EMC's arrays today support RAID 5, RAID 6 or RAID 1/10 on EMC EFDs)
- DS8K SSD’s must be installed on a DA pair without any other drive types on the DA (CLARiiON, Symmetrix DMX and V-Max allow EFDs to be placed on any drive channel and to be intermixed with any other drive type)
- A maximum of 16 SSD's can be installed on any DS8K DA pair, for a total maximum of 128 SSDs (Symmetrix DMX4 supports128 EFDs standard and more via RPQ; V-Max supports 256 EFDs and more via RPQ)
- If you install ANY SSDs in a DS8K, your maximum configuration is limited to 2 expansion bays and your maximum number of drives (SSDs + HDDs combined) is limited to 256 (128 for the smaller DS8K) (EFDs have no impact on the total number of drives or expansion cabinets you can configure on with CLARiiON, DMX or V-Max, and if you want a V-Max with 2400 EFDs, all you have to do is ask).
- You cannot order a DS8K with only SSDs (both Symmetrix DMX-4 and V-Max can be RPQ'd as flash-only configurations, although using HDDs for vault drives is more cost-effective).
- Although STEC asserts that IBM is using the latest ZeusIOPS drives, IBM is only offering the 73GB and 146GB STEC drives (EMC is shipping the latest ZeusIOPS drives in 200GB and 400GB capacities for DMX4 and V-Max, affording customers a lower $/GB, higher density and lower power/footprint per usable GB.)
- The only way to relocate data from HDD to SSD on a DS8K is via host-based copy utilities, which consumes host MIPS and adds load to both server and storage while potentially requiring application downtime to effect the relocation (Symmetrix DMX4, V-Max and CLARiiON all offer array-based non-disruptive Virtual LUN relocation; VLUN on Symmetrix supports both Open Systems and Mainframe volumes, and V-Max also allows for changing the RAID type when relocating a LUN to a different tier)
- z/OS support of Solid State Drives in the DS8K will be available on z/OS V1.8, or later. (Both Symmetrix DMX4 and V-Max support EFDs for mainframes running any version of z/OS, z/VM or TPF. Additionally, V-Max supports EFDs for use by iSeries and AS/400 servers)
And finally, despite all the bluster and fanfare of IBM's Quicksilver demo last year, there has been no mention to date of anything truly innovative in IBM's use of flash. In particular, not a peep out of IBM (or anyone else, for that matter) that they have anything even REMOTELY similar to EMC's Fully Automated Storage Tiering (FAST) that was announced on April 14 along with the V-Max.
For while flash as a "Tier 0" is interesting and useful ("Tier 0" is an EMC term that IBM has copied, by the way), the
true full power of flash will only be realized when the system can automatically and dynamically utilize flash capacity to accelerate the LUNs and sub-LUN data chunks that are used most frequently and/or that achieve the greatest benefits from significantly reduced response times.
Come to think of it, the DS8K doesn't even offer thin provisioning – with Symmetrix and CLARiiON, you can use Virtual Provisioning on EFD capacity to maximize the utilization of that expensive capacity!
the true meaning – ibm is abandoning storage
Or at least, they clearly aren't taking storage seriously.
More importantly, the aging, decrepit DS8K is no longer a viable storage platform for the enterprise. Later this year, IBM will finally get around to upgrading the aging DS8K processors to the p6, but it won't be enough to catch up with the Symmetrix V-Max.
And the XIV debacle is almost over, as customers learn first hand that everything I've said about the data corruption and performance is in fact true (thanks to all the free eval units seeded over the past 12 month). Moshe has cashed all his checks, and the shine has worn off for that "special XIV sales overlay," as they all get hit with real quotas, the end of their draws, and the ultimate insult of getting folded back into the mainstream sales force.
And while IBM has been handing cold cash to Moshe, it has been starving the DS8K. Meanwhile, Joe Tucci has upped funding on storage platforms, and the Symmetrix V-Max has totally re-defined enterprise-class storage. True scale-out architecture, built on industry standard components, and leveraging the time-proven Enginuity operating system (instead of cobbling together a loosely connected hodge-podge of Linux-based storage services), Symmetrix V-Max has defined a storage future that inevitably won't include any IBM-manufactured storage.
IMHO, at least.
This post is from the storage anarchist.